Convey tx verification failure reasons to the RPC client

This allows appropriate action to be taken, like displaying
the reason to the user.

Do just that in simplewallet, which should help a lot in
determining why users fail to send.

Also make it so a tx which is accepted but not relayed is
seen as a success rather than a failure.
This commit is contained in:
moneromooo-monero
2016-03-27 12:37:18 +01:00
parent 1559c71ef2
commit 24b3e9007a
10 changed files with 98 additions and 23 deletions
+15 -3
View File
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ namespace cryptonote
if(!check_inputs_types_supported(tx))
{
tvc.m_verifivation_failed = true;
tvc.m_invalid_input = true;
return false;
}
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ namespace cryptonote
{
LOG_PRINT_L1("transaction use more money then it has: use " << print_money(outputs_amount) << ", have " << print_money(inputs_amount));
tvc.m_verifivation_failed = true;
tvc.m_overspend = true;
return false;
}
@@ -124,6 +126,7 @@ namespace cryptonote
{
LOG_PRINT_L1("transaction fee is not enough: " << print_money(fee) << ", minimum fee: " << print_money(needed_fee));
tvc.m_verifivation_failed = true;
tvc.m_fee_too_low = true;
return false;
}
@@ -132,6 +135,7 @@ namespace cryptonote
{
LOG_PRINT_L1("transaction is too big: " << blob_size << " bytes, maximum size: " << tx_size_limit);
tvc.m_verifivation_failed = true;
tvc.m_too_big = true;
return false;
}
@@ -142,21 +146,23 @@ namespace cryptonote
{
LOG_PRINT_L1("Transaction with id= "<< id << " used already spent key images");
tvc.m_verifivation_failed = true;
tvc.m_double_spend = true;
return false;
}
}
if (!m_blockchain.check_tx_outputs(tx))
if (!m_blockchain.check_tx_outputs(tx, tvc))
{
LOG_PRINT_L1("Transaction with id= "<< id << " has at least one invalid outout");
tvc.m_verifivation_failed = true;
tvc.m_invalid_output = true;
return false;
}
crypto::hash max_used_block_id = null_hash;
uint64_t max_used_block_height = 0;
#if BLOCKCHAIN_DB == DB_LMDB
bool ch_inp_res = m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(tx, max_used_block_height, max_used_block_id, kept_by_block);
bool ch_inp_res = m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(tx, max_used_block_height, max_used_block_id, tvc, kept_by_block);
#else
bool ch_inp_res = m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(tx, max_used_block_height, max_used_block_id);
#endif
@@ -480,7 +486,8 @@ namespace cryptonote
if(txd.last_failed_id != null_hash && m_blockchain.get_current_blockchain_height() > txd.last_failed_height && txd.last_failed_id == m_blockchain.get_block_id_by_height(txd.last_failed_height))
return false;//we already sure that this tx is broken for this height
if(!m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(txd.tx, txd.max_used_block_height, txd.max_used_block_id))
tx_verification_context tvc;
if(!m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(txd.tx, txd.max_used_block_height, txd.max_used_block_id, tvc))
{
txd.last_failed_height = m_blockchain.get_current_blockchain_height()-1;
txd.last_failed_id = m_blockchain.get_block_id_by_height(txd.last_failed_height);
@@ -496,7 +503,12 @@ namespace cryptonote
if(txd.last_failed_id == m_blockchain.get_block_id_by_height(txd.last_failed_height))
return false;
//check ring signature again, it is possible (with very small chance) that this transaction become again valid
#if BLOCKCHAIN_DB == DB_LMDB
tx_verification_context tvc;
if(!m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(txd.tx, txd.max_used_block_height, txd.max_used_block_id, tvc))
#else
if(!m_blockchain.check_tx_inputs(txd.tx, txd.max_used_block_height, txd.max_used_block_id))
#endif
{
txd.last_failed_height = m_blockchain.get_current_blockchain_height()-1;
txd.last_failed_id = m_blockchain.get_block_id_by_height(txd.last_failed_height);